The Key to Eurozone Stability Isn’t Monetary

The Eurozone debt crisis has raised important issues in the profession of economics. With regards to monetary integration much knowledge has been developed thanks to the crisis. Economist have virtually all rallied to the idea that  monetary unions exacerbate competitive imbalances. The Proof is in the widening gap of current accounts between the germanic like economies and the profligate periphery economies. Germany has never exported so much while the PIIGS have not suffered so much in a while. While the causes of the crisis are apparent to almost everyone (except maybe the Greeks) policy prescription differences abound. The prevailing view is to infuse massive amounts of liquidity into sovereign debt markets to stop the liquidity haemorrhage. The theory that the Eurozone is in a temporary liquidity crisis has strong proponents such as Paul Krugman or Roger Bootle. While Ireland has a strong growth profile and Italy does have a primary surplus that could justify monetary stopgap policies the problems of the other Euro profligates cannot be tidied over by temporary monetary measures because their issues are of a structural competitive order.

Once monetary policy impotence is accepted two policies approaches remain. The first is fiscal integration. A lot of economist advocate Euro bonds to alleviate market pressures on individual member finances. The obvious problems pertain to moral hazards. One of the causes of the crisis was that the reduction in sovereign interest rates because of decreased currency risk would induce profligacy. Such a phenomenon would be continued and compounded by Eurobonds. A fairness issue would also arise as lower debt countries would pay for the debt spending of others and AAA rated countries would actually pay heftier interest than they deserve. A problem in construction is also obvious. Eurobonds would be a substitute investment for sovereigns, unless Eurobonds replaced sovereigns entirely they would cannibalize demand for sovereigns and might actually help increase sovereign yields as German bunds have done to French Bonds today.

Instead of pooling liabilities to decrease individual sovereign risk, why not pool assets? This might be somewhat more palatable to German hawks. One way of pooling assets would be to federalize Unemployment Insurance. All members could pay into a fund that would back payments of insurance payouts. This would further effectively create an internal counter cyclical government spending stabilisation. As some states power ahead the transfers would automatically alleviate budgets in ailing economies. This already exists in Canada to great inter-provincial budgetary stability, the proof being that Quebec’s yields are at historical lows although the province has comparable debt levels to many PIIGS. Unfortunately as with all insurance schemes moral hazards subsiste, but the idea remains a good way to alleviate massive intra monetary union budgetary differences.

Fiscal integration however will not in the long term eradicate structural problems. The crux of the Eurozone problem is quite simply competitive differences. For a monetary union to survive in the long run productivity must balance out across its membership. Standardizing macro-prudential or regulatory frameworks across the zone is a good idea, but only when the policies standardized across the monetary union are good. Mis-regulation at a central level is worst than at the individual problem, imagine what the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis if everyone had emulated Greece or Spain’s policies. Diversity and regulatory competition is good so long as it leads to emulating of best practices. That countries aren’t emulating Germany is testament to political and not economic issues.

The only issue remaining is that of markets prevented from punishing political cultures conducive to bad policy. Greece has a political culture conducive to demagogy and fiscal populism. Markets are sending Greeks a message, “change your ways or suffer” that the European Union prevents this pedagogical process from unfolding is the real long term risk to Eurozone stability.

European Quantitative Easers Let’s Talk

The Eurozone sovereign debt crisis is posing a real challenge to Europe’s policy makers. The un-abating liquidity squeeze on government borrowing is threatening to turn into a solvency crisis in which more Eurozone countries are at risk of defaulting on their debts. The interest rates at which governments are currently borrowing are for the most part unsustainable, with countries like Italy and Spain borrowing at dangerous levels previously reserved for the smaller members of the PIIGS group. Broadly, two schools of thought have emerged with solutions to the problems at hand, one we will call the Monetary Keynesians and the other the German School of thinkers. The former are represented by such personalities as Roger Bootle of Capital Economics, the famous Dr Doom Nouriel Roubini and the New York Times Econom ic’s Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman, while the latter are represented by the likes of the resigned ECB Governing Council members Axel Weber and Jurgen Stark.

The first group is advocating using the printing press and nationalizing (or federalizing) distressed sovereign debt. That is to say they want the Eurozone, through the ECB, to print money to by debts that can’t be paid back by member countries who spend more money on goods and services than they produce. The excuse found to justify this action is that the fledgeling economies are actually able to produce enough wealth to sustain their social systems but that because of a temporary bleep of liquidity issues they need temporary help. Nothing could be further from the truth. France to name just one of the irresponsible countries (although not yet a crisis country) has not passed a balanced budget since 1973! Greece has lied about its overspending for years prior to the crisis and the Eurozone as a groupe only managed a budget surplus in 2001 in the last 20 or more years. What does this say about European fiscal rectitude? it says that it doesn’t exist the Eurozone has always had a structural deficit. The sovereign debt crisis has been in the making for a long time, the Keynesians excuse that it is a temporary problem needing papering over is bogus.

Not just bogus but also internally inconsistent. Keynesianism calls for counter cyclical fiscal policy, while american liberals like Paul Krugman say that pro growth spending is positive in bad and good times alike. In any case the Greeks have proved that policy wrong. Another solution proposed by the less hawkish of economists is to have the ECB double down on its LTRO or renew its sovereign bond buying program. Imagine the ECB mostly backed by Germany buying Spanish, Portugese or Italian bonds. Now imagine investors believe that the problem remains unfixed and that primary deficits can’t be fixed by liquidity improvements, yields will continue rising and bond values will continue dropping. The ECB will either have to print money to paper over its loss sparking inflation or it will have to beg the big Eurozone economies to bail it out. Now assuming Europeans remember what low growth high inflation looks like (see 70’s and 80’s) they will surely stay true to their feelings of entitlement and choose to pressure the Eurozone core to pay up.

Now the Germans, Finnish, Dutch et al. have already shown their distaste for profligate Mediterraneans’ bail outs, so does anybody really think the ECB will go down that road? Well you’d be right if you think it might happen, with all the German resignations at the ECB, the institution seems to be loosing its hawkish edge. Forget the stellar inflation busting record under Trichet, the ECB is going south.

These are disappointing times for some economists, the world is awash with exemples of virtuous macroeconomic policy and yet some continue to advocate tried and failed policies or policies that are untried and risky. Why does no one point towards Canada where austerity in the nineties have led to stable government expenditure levels today, or Germany where austerity was imposed, unit labour cost were lowered and how about Estonia which consolidated spending massively in the face of a deep contraction in output and today is one of the Eurozone’s fastest growing economies. The Eurozone periphery is small enough that deep primary-surplus generating government spending contractions wouldn’t affect he currency zone as a whole too deeply. Portugal and Greece could have been the next Estonias, instead talks of bailout and quantitative easing has inspired periphery politicians to stall and not make the necessary decisions for growth.

The PIIGS, France and all other fiscally week Eurozone countries need to do three things: stop dithering and waiting for someone else to bail them out. They need to emulate Mario Monti’s drive for competitiveness, shoot for growth and competitiveness. Then they need to emulate the tiny Estonian country and actually start generating budget balances through lower expenditure and not through heightened taxes. What the rest of the World needs to do is stop giving ball-less politicians excuses for their failures and easy solution proposition. The road to wealth has already been traced, it’s time Europeans stopped pretending they are smarter than the rest of the World and American liberals need to open their eyes to the reality that free lunches dont exist and the hard road is the better road!

Here’s a Suggestion Mr Carney

The governor of the Bank of Canada Mark Carney has again continued to scold and give lessons to Canadians. He does this in his Monetary Policy Report of April 2012 where he reiterates some of the comments this blog criticized in a previous post. Those comments were that Canadian exporters needed to retool and refocus and that Canadian consumers needed to slow their pace of debt accumulation. The focus of the ‘retool, refocus and retrain’ mantra is largely advocated so as to increase Canadian firm’s ability to compete internationally and export. While this blog has already stated its objection to paternalistic economic communication from government institutions towards the private sector, this blog does accept Carney’s view that Canadian prosperity is underpinned by healthy trade numbers and international competitiveness. There is one criticism the Governor could have levelled that balances private sector independence and improved competitiveness, that critic should be less debt supply and it should be levelled at governments.

Talk of trade competitiveness unfortunately always boils down to currencies. In Canada manufacturers and commentators are always complain about the high Canadian dollar and how many jobs it kills. Leaving aside the fact that a high currency has as many benefits for a country as it has costs, a currency artificially above its equilibrium (or below it for that matter) is however  a concern. Let’s assume that the Canadian dollar is artificially overvalue, who might the culprit be for this imbalance? The Loonie isn’t a reserve currency so that can’t be it. Contrarily to McGuinty’s opinion oil isn’t to blame either. As the Central Bank report notes, Canadian oil is sold at a steep discount to certain international oil benchmarks, meaning that eastern Canada imports at high prices while the west exports at cheap prices, so the impact of higher oil prices only marginally affects the Canadian currency. In any case studies have refuted the claim of the Loonie being a petro-dollar. So who exactly is contributing to the Canadian dollar remaining above par with the US dollar?

To answer that question the certain economic facts need to be reviewed. Commentaries on trade and currencies often emphasize a restricted number of causes for currency fluctuations. Currency movements need to be understood in terms of foreign exchange market equilibrium. Every currency trade impacts the prevailing exchange rate but every trade does not just involve a quick speculation or an oil contract purchase. Much purchasing and selling of currencies involves savings diversification by institutional money managers. To give some colour to this point in 2007 before the crisis hit, foreigners shed roughly ~10 Billion of government paper while exporters sold just over 460 Billion dollars of exports. Since the beginning of the crisis over 400 Billion of Canadian government financial papers have been sold to foreigners. What does all this mean? Government budget surplus reduces the supply of government debt available to foreigners for purchase, a government deficit increases the supply. Since foreigners must buy Canadian dollars to purchase both export goods and government debt, Canadian governments’ profligacies are partially to blame for the high Canadian dollar. Part of their issuance of debt has been sold to foreigners increasing the demand for the Loonie and crowding out exports of goods and services.

Some might be tempted to point to Europe to refute these assertions. They would note Europe’s deficits have widened since 08 while the Euro has generally fallen. This is easily explained by sovereign risk. Canadian government debt is perceived to be a safe investment while much of the Euro area’s debts are considered very risky. Investors the World over generally prefer to buy Canadian debts than those from the PIIGS as they could be described as better quality products. Essentially Canada’s two most popular exports have now become oil and debt, small wonder manufacturing in Ontario can’t keep up. So if Mark Carney is so considered with the twin problem of profligacy and competitive weakness why isn’t he calling for Government austerity?

Greece! Go Away!

I sometimes shiver with humiliation at the memories of my adolescence and the utter immaturity that characterized them. I comfort myself with the thought that I have outgrown them. I used to believe that people outgrew their baser adolescent instincts of selfishness, laziness and general disdain for responsibility, I could not phantom the possibility that an entire populace could degenerate into a mindless mob of collective adolescents. Greece has proved me oh so wrong. Now before anybody get’s up and antsy about the broad generalization I recognize that not all greeks are in the streets hooded in black and throwing fiery cocktails around. However, the despairing state of the Greek economy is the business of all those people and the general result of their cumulative collective decisions. The guilty parties are, in no particular order: tax evaders, union leaders and members, politicians, savers, voters, anarchists, socialists, wannabe monopolists, retirees, students and anyone silent on the going-ons of the county. That list I believe covers more or less the majority of the people from the small nation that gave the world democracy.

Reading up on the back and forth between Athens, the Troika and various European capitals I’ll admit to a sinking feeling of despair. Berlin’s demands just keep mounting and the absurdity of Greek politics never retreats. German flags are being burned in the streets of Greece, right-wing papers in the country compare Merkel to a Nazi while across the divide any remaining AAA country in the Euro are simply loosing interest in Greece who has proved a most unreliable partner in the battle for economic stability.

I’m no Keynesian but the repeated bouts of austerity demanded by Greece’s Euro creditors are pummelling the periphery’s economies harshly. I don’t believe I’ve ever heard a Monetarist or even an Austrian economist recommend pro-cyclical fiscal policy systemically. Austrians economists might say that recessions are good because they kill bad business models permitting the flowering of sustainable industry. However even the most die-hard fiscal hawks (me) have to admit that at an above 6% contraction yearly with no hope in sight for growth, even good businesses will flounder. That’s why fiscal consolidation in Greece needs to be accompanied by stimulus spending funded by the competitive parts of Europe. Pan-European unemployment insurance is the most sensible proposal that has not gone main stream yet. The moral hazard that will ensue is undeniable but until permanent mechanisms for intra-Euro fiscal transfers can be worked out, the benefits are surely worth the cost.

That said that the money masters’ responses to continued contraction in the periphery are inadequate, the reaction from the patients are increasingly unacceptable. In Italy the unions responses to the Monti plan for liberalization are tantamount to the summum of Human selfishness. While the house is burning the unions are trying to save their clothes while some are still trapped (the unemployed) admittedly while some have already fled (the tax evaders). The retired are equally deserving of blame silent on the whole affaire so long as their golden retirements are not threatened even when these same retirement plans are bankrupting their nation. But while Spain and Italy’s yields come down showing the markets forgiving side, or just the ECB vast manipulation skills, Greece and Portugal edge towards the brink. While tame in Lisbon, reactions in Athens are flaring up to an extreme.

I long ago learned that the most vociferous voices rarely represent or even understand the silent majority. The silent majority in most western countries are hard working middle class and relatively rational voters. Even when they are swindled into voting for a party that ill benefits their country’s these voters always (almost) correct their aim sending back their political systems to the center. This does not seem to be happening in Greece. Not only has the majority let its political leaders lead them to a path of reckless fiscal irresponsibility and stupidity, they now seem unwilling to admit to the wrongness of their ways. For God’s sake Greece’s politicians are asking to be the least trusted west of Tehran. Its anarchist youth are trying to give 80’s Italian terrorist youths a run for their money. To reverse an oft heard insult, the Greeks’ silent majority is about to be hoodwinked into poverty faster than Germans were into Nazism. Greeks have committed the cardinal sin of fiscal profligacy, they have been found guilty by the markets, they are now in a liquidity and solvency jail. The rest of Europe has posted bail, and now has promised to take Greece into a pseudo form of receivership in order to buy the fledging country a little decency and freedom. Greek response to the modest conditions demanded of it, spitting in the AAA’s faces. The audacity and hypocrisy demonstrated in the land of classical drama is baffling to say the least and shockingly amoral.

While I wish a speedy recovery for all of Europe and hope that the beauty of the European project can be furthered, I’d be lying if I didn’t say I believe the Greeks have lost all rights to participate in the next chapter of Europe’s history.